March 26, 2019 read, explore

Think Twice Before Voting Green in 2016

This election cycle, Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has ignited a political revolution that, despite his withdrawal from the Democratic primaries, has had a lasting influence. Many voters still supporting his progressive proposals have expressed contempt at the Hillary Clinton, the Democrats’ nominee. As a result, those on the #Bernieorbust train have decided that if Sanders isn’t the nominee, they would refuse to vote Democrat in November. Instead, they’ll vote Republican, Libertarian, or Green. Out of all of the options, many Sanders supports have opted to go Green.

The Green Party’s nominee, Jill Stein, a political activist and practicing doctor, ran in 2012 and captured less than 500,000 votes, a meager 0.36% of all votes collected. Yet given the circumstances this election season, where a growing number of people are willing to support a third party candidate, many Sanders supporters believe that Stein has an actual chance at winning the election. Stein is running on a highly progressive platform, very similar to that of Sanders, a major reason why she is becoming increasingly popular – she’s now polling at 3%.

But aside the main argument not to vote third party in November – it gives Donald Trump a much higher chance to win over Clinton – there’s still a lot of reasons to not pick Stein.

GMOs: The Green Party’s platform states, “Label GMOs, and put a moratorium on GMOs and pesticides until they are proven safe.” A complete shutdown on the use of GMOs in America would be disastrous; GMOs are integral to the success of the agriculture industry and they’re proven to be safe and beneficial to the environment, something that the Green Party cares about. In fact, more than 100 Nobel laureates have signed a letter requesting Greenpeace to ends its fight against GMOs.

Nuclear Energy: A few months ago, Stein tweeted, “Nuclear power plants = weapons of mass destruction waiting to be detonated. Time to shut them down. #EndNukes.” While clean, safe energy is a must for America in the future, Stein’s position on nuclear energy is absolutely ludicrous. Nuclear reactors, apart from very few accidents, are extremely safe, and they don’t contribute to climate change. If America wants to turn to clean energy, nuclear power is absolutely necessary. Dismantling every single nuclear power plant because of a minuscule chance of an accident isn’t a feasible way to get America on the right track to renewable energy.

Defense: Stein’s platform states that the US should “restore the National Guard as the centerpiece of our defense” while cutting “military spending by at least 50%.” Making the National Guard the main component of the military, like during the 1800s, isn’t very realistic in the 21st century. Currently, the National Guard is essentially a pseudo-militia whose members train once in every month and are usually used in event of weather-related emergencies. Revamping the standing army to a part-time militia won’t do anything to help America’s security or reputation. And decreasing America’s defense budget is necessary, yes, but radically by 50% is going to do much more harm than good. Stein also doesn’t make any recommendation of what to cut or how cuts are going to be timed. The military budget is definitely excessive, and Stein has an opportunity to show specifically what she would do to control spending in her platform. But she doesn’t.

Stein & the Green Party have potential. Many parts of their platform, like fighting poverty, supporting human rights, and reforming the election process are significant and worthy of discussion. But time and time again, Stein has shown that she’s simply not the candidate for the Presidency; the only elected office she’s held is city council. In one interview, she argued that quantitative easing, a monetary policy used to help the US recover from 2008’s recession, could be used to erase student loans. She then stated that QE “is a magic trick that basically people don’t need to understand any more about than that it is a magic trick.” What?

In other instances, the Green Party is simply impractical. They want America to be 100% clean energy by 2030 (which is just 14 years away) and a “Medicare for all” healthcare system that would be wildly expensive. The Green Party is striving for criminal justice reform, a stronger education system, and a just economy. We need that. But the way the Green Party is tackling many of the issues is unrealistic at best and nonsensical at worst.

Idealism is admirable, but realism is necessary.

[Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore]

Related Posts

Trump’s First 100 Days in Office Will be Telling

Donald Trump has been busy working with his transition team in order to establish policy that he wants to enact...

#GoldenShowerGate: 5 Allegations BuzzFeed Article Made Against Donald Trump

If you haven’t heard, BuzzFeed–the site known for quizzes with names like ‘We Know How Many Kids You’ll Have Based...

What Impact Will Brexit Have On The Gaming Industry?

A lot changed after the British public voted to leave the European Union on June 23. The value of the...

Donald Trumps Call To Criminalize Flag-burning Is Ridiculous

I was hoping that President-elect Trump would fight for liberty as many of his positions have suggested (minus his stance...

Is Trump’s Claim That Millions Voted Illegally Completely Crazy?

If you’ve been paying attention to any of the major news outlets, you know that Trump made a claim that...

Why Trump Has To Be A Great President

I haven’t heard many people talk about the possibility of President-elect Donald Trump actually being a good president. Most of...

Michael Moore’s Plan To Beat Trump Is Adorable

In the wake of Trump’s major upset victory, Michael Moore (who predicted Trumps win) took to Facebook to make a...

Why We’re Endorsing Donald Trump For President

The country is once again nearing the point at which we elect our new president. This is the first time...

Christians Need To Stop Shaming Trump Supporters

There are so many “holier than thou” Christian conservatives out there telling others that to support Trump is basically the...

Will Trump Recover From His Post-convention Spiral?

If you’ve visited any political website or news channel in the last week, you’ve heard a lot about polls. The...

Beyond Background Checks: More Ways to Stop Gun Violence

In the 212 days since the start of 2016, there have been 271 mass shootings in the United States. While...

Auditing the Fed: What It Really Means

The Republican Party’s new official platform returned to many traditional (and what many would call outdated) ideas and principles, like...

Why Ted Cruz Might Be the GOP’s 2020 Nominee

In a convention that was filled with chaos and controversy, from Melania Trump’s alleged plagiarism of Michelle Obama to Chris...

Well, The New Kings Kaleidoscope Album ‘Beyond Control’ Is Out

This is going to be an honest review of the album, if you’d like to hear only positive things about...

If You Support Trump You’re Probably An Authoritarian, Obscure Study Claims

Vox, the publication known for its unbiased political analyses, published a video last month that explored the relation between authoritarians and...

Comments
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *